balancer just got drained for ~$116M this wasn't sophisticated. it was a basic access control bug in their vault contract here’s how it happened, what it reveals - and why it should scare every defi protocol alive: 1/
the exploit hit balancer v2 today across ethereum, arbitrum, polygon, base, optimism, and more over $116M gone. 6,590 WETH. 6,851 osETH. 4,260 wstETH all pulled from the core vault at 0xBA1...BF2C8 2/
the bug was in "manageUserBalance" - a function that's supposed to validate who can move funds instead, it confused msg.sender with a user-supplied op.sender field attackers used WITHDRAW_INTERNAL operations to drain tokens they never deposited 3/
what makes this worse? balancer V2 uses a single vault for everything. every pool, every chain. hit the vault, hit them all. many forks are at risk as well. 4/
this is balancer's third major hack in five years 2021, 2023, and now 2025: $116M+ and counting 5/
let's zoom out. balancer isn't some experiment. $750M TVL. audited. live for years.and yet: a basic access control flaw sat in prod, audits missed it, no proper sender validation, funds mixed in one central vault. 6/
this is balancer's third major hack in five years 2021: millions lost 2023: $238K after being warned 2025: $116M+ this isn't just a Balancer problem. it's a defi illusion problem "audited" =/= safe. "battle-tested" =/= secure 7/
takeaway: basic access control bugs are still destroying blue-chip protocols if you're building: review every permission check twice. if you're a user: "audited" means someone looked once, not that it's bulletproof this wasn't advanced. we're just careless 8/
defi can do better. but first, we need to admit: the basics still matter more than the hype. i’ll post more as the onchain trail evolves 9/
there are a few reports that the attacker didn't just exploit permissions. they manipulated BPT pricing through precision loss in the StableSwap math. - drain one token to a rounding edge - exploit rounding errors to deflate BPT price - buy back BPT cheap, profit /10
more details here about how price manipulation was done[1] still waiting for the balancer’s official response. will keep updating the thread as things unfold. [1]
7,165
64
本页面内容由第三方提供。除非另有说明,欧易不是所引用文章的作者,也不对此类材料主张任何版权。该内容仅供参考,并不代表欧易观点,不作为任何形式的认可,也不应被视为投资建议或购买或出售数字资产的招揽。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情况下,此类人工智能生成的内容可能不准确或不一致。请阅读链接文章,了解更多详情和信息。欧易不对第三方网站上的内容负责。包含稳定币、NFTs 等在内的数字资产涉及较高程度的风险,其价值可能会产生较大波动。请根据自身财务状况,仔细考虑交易或持有数字资产是否适合您。