balancer just got drained for ~$116M
this wasn't sophisticated. it was a basic access control bug in their vault contract
here’s how it happened, what it reveals - and why it should scare every defi protocol alive:
1/
the exploit hit balancer v2 today across ethereum, arbitrum, polygon, base, optimism, and more
over $116M gone. 6,590 WETH. 6,851 osETH. 4,260 wstETH
all pulled from the core vault at 0xBA1...BF2C8
2/
the bug was in "manageUserBalance" - a function that's supposed to validate who can move funds
instead, it confused msg.sender with a user-supplied op.sender field
attackers used WITHDRAW_INTERNAL operations to drain tokens they never deposited
3/
what makes this worse?
balancer V2 uses a single vault for everything. every pool, every chain.
hit the vault, hit them all.
many forks are at risk as well.
4/
this is balancer's third major hack in five years
2021, 2023, and now 2025: $116M+ and counting
5/
let's zoom out.
balancer isn't some experiment. $750M TVL. audited.
live for years.and yet: a basic access control flaw sat in prod, audits missed it, no proper sender validation, funds mixed in one central vault.
6/
this is balancer's third major hack in five years
2021: millions lost
2023: $238K after being warned
2025: $116M+
this isn't just a Balancer problem. it's a defi illusion problem
"audited" =/= safe. "battle-tested" =/= secure
7/
takeaway:
basic access control bugs are still destroying blue-chip protocols
if you're building: review every permission check twice.
if you're a user: "audited" means someone looked once, not that it's bulletproof
this wasn't advanced. we're just careless
8/
defi can do better. but first, we need to admit: the basics still matter more than the hype.
i’ll post more as the onchain trail evolves
9/
there are a few reports that the attacker didn't just exploit permissions. they manipulated BPT pricing through precision loss in the StableSwap math.
- drain one token to a rounding edge
- exploit rounding errors to deflate BPT price
- buy back BPT cheap, profit
/10
more details here about how price manipulation was done[1]
still waiting for the balancer’s official response. will keep updating the thread as things unfold.
[1]
7,17 k
64
Le contenu de cette page est fourni par des tiers. Sauf indication contraire, OKX n’est pas l’auteur du ou des articles cités et ne revendique aucun droit d’auteur sur le contenu. Le contenu est fourni à titre d’information uniquement et ne représente pas les opinions d’OKX. Il ne s’agit pas d’une approbation de quelque nature que ce soit et ne doit pas être considéré comme un conseil en investissement ou une sollicitation d’achat ou de vente d’actifs numériques. Dans la mesure où l’IA générative est utilisée pour fournir des résumés ou d’autres informations, ce contenu généré par IA peut être inexact ou incohérent. Veuillez lire l’article associé pour obtenir davantage de détails et d’informations. OKX n’est pas responsable du contenu hébergé sur des sites tiers. La détention d’actifs numériques, y compris les stablecoins et les NFT, implique un niveau de risque élevé et leur valeur peut considérablement fluctuer. Examinez soigneusement votre situation financière pour déterminer si le trading ou la détention d’actifs numériques vous convient.