Morpho's P2P layer is smart, but is the capital truly 'efficient' or just leveraged risk? $MORPHO
Thesis: Morpho optimizes yield, but it doesn't eliminate inherited risk. The efficiency gain is directly tied to the uncompromised security of Aave/Compound.
The Paradox: By relying on the base layer as a safety net, Morpho's capital efficiency is fundamentally capped by the base layer's capacity and risk appetite. It's a layer of optimization, not creation.
The Path Forward: For Morpho to be a DeFi giant, it must establish true governance independence and its own segregated risk engine, moving beyond being a 'better router' for existing pools.
Can Morpho escape the gravitational pull of its underlying protocols and forge an independent risk model? That is the real test. #Morpho #DeFi #Lending
762
1
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明,OKX 不是所引用文章的作者,也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考,並不代表 OKX 觀點,不作為任何形式的認可,也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下,此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章,瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險,其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況,仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。

