On-chain, new assets are being minted every day. Zora, Base, Blast, Farcaster... these platforms are like coin factories, constantly releasing speculative desires. But we should also ask: Are they all the same in what they produce? Tools vs Products: No one-size-fits-all They are typical zero-friction speculative platforms, quickly minting coins and automatically pooling them, with clear games—it's all about play. Zora, on the other hand, is more like a cultural platform, focusing on $NFT, $ERC20, limited minting, emphasizing creator expression and cultural experimentation. Platforms are just tools; their quality depends on the following points: 1️⃣ What kind of $Token is issued 2️⃣ Is there a good story told 3️⃣ Is there community support 4️⃣ Is there incentive design 5️⃣ Is there a real flywheel (positive cycle) Ultimately, it's not about the platform; it's about whether the assets you issue can stand on their own. $CulturalCoin ≠ $SpeculativeCoin The core of the controversy is: Is a cultural coin a scam? The answer is: Most are, but a few are not. Those $Meme / $Culture projects that survive usually do three things: 🔥 Consensus building: The story is engaging 🔥 Community operation: Continuous content + interaction 🔥 Mechanism design: Can guide holding + re-creation + growth Conversely, those projects that shout cultural slogans but rely on $KOLs to pump usually go to zero in three weeks. So the question isn't whether you say you're a cultural coin, but rather: Are you really doing culture, or are you just using culture as a guise to exploit people? Investors need to upgrade their judgment Today's on-chain market is an extremely flat information landscape with extremely complex behaviors—a $PvP game. ❌ Not every $Meme is garbage ❌ Not every $AI or $NFT is reliable ❌ And just because something is pumped doesn't mean it will go to zero; what Zora mints may indeed have value. What you really need to learn are the following types of judgment: 1️⃣ Look at the mechanism: Is the tokenomics reasonable? 2️⃣ Look at the rhythm: Is there a clear rhythm and operational plan? 3️⃣ Look at the community: Is there spontaneous content and viral momentum? If you can't understand it, that's okay—but please don't deceive yourself by saying this time is really different. In summary: You can call it $CreatorCoins, $AITokens, $CultureTokens, $ChainNativeAssets... But if there's no flywheel, no rhythm, no community, just pure minting + pooling, then it's just a rebranded $shitcoin. In the end, it's still a zero-sum game. The issue isn't the platform, nor is it the $Meme, but rather: Do you have the ability to recognize value, And do you have the courage to acknowledge reality.
Show original
18.49K
54
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.