In the end, even the shadow of the children's table is gone. Is there still hope? @anoma
Anoma: From "performance competition" to "intent collaboration"
Looking at the current landscape, most projects are caught in a performance rat race—focusing on improving TPS and reducing costs, while neglecting the core proposition of blockchain as a value collaboration infrastructure:
How to efficiently align and execute users' true intentions, addressing the fragility of cross-entity coordination. If the accumulation of technical parameters cannot translate into collaboration among people, systems, and values, it remains essentially a technical deadlock.
The core breakthrough of @anoma lies in stepping out of the performance dimension to construct an "intent-centric" architecture: starting from user needs (Intent) rather than being constrained by technical protocols. Its modular decoupled design achieves compatibility with existing businesses while allowing for system iteration, avoiding the traditional chain risk of "upgrading means forking"; the privacy-native underlying design further fills the gap of existing public chains that struggle to balance "value transparency and identity privacy"—this is not a simple addition of functions, but a reconstruction of the collaborative link of "user needs-system response-value settlement."
Looking further, Anoma's value lies in redefining the positioning of blockchain:
Upgrading from "decentralized storage/transfer tools" to "trusted collaborative mediums." Traditional blockchain's cross-entity coordination relies on complex nested smart contracts or third-party intermediaries, leading to high coordination costs and low fault tolerance. Anoma, through intent parsing and automatic matching, allows different entities' value demands to efficiently connect without the need for trusted intermediaries, shifting collaboration from "passive adaptation" to "active response."
This design logic centered on "collaboration efficiency" does not compete with existing blockchains but rather returns to the original technical intention of blockchain—reducing the trust cost of human collaboration through decentralized technology.
#Anoma
What is the underlying logic of Anoma?
From the conversation between adrianbrink and Vinny, we can clearly see the core idea of @anoma that distinguishes it from most blockchain projects—avoiding the shackles of "inter-chain competition" and instead building a compatible and practical system centered around "user needs."
Anoma's "intention" architecture is highly innovative.
It is not bound to a single underlying chain and can be flexibly deployed on mainstream chains like Ethereum and Solana, as well as scaling solutions like Arbitrum, providing a unified distributed operating system.
This design directly addresses the pain point of "technological hegemony" in the blockchain industry—most projects are obsessed with proving that "their security model is optimal," forming rigid chain camps, while @anoma returns the choice to users, allowing them to configure according to their trust in Ethereum or Bitcoin, truly breaking down inter-chain barriers and laying the foundation for the inclusivity of the "world computer."
What’s even more valuable is its focus on "differentiated needs":
adrianbrink emphasizes that the needs of users in Argentina and Germany are different, and Vinny further focuses on the pain points of cross-border payments in Latin America, the trust crisis in fiat currencies, and the infrastructure challenges in areas without internet.
This indicates that @anoma has not deviated from the essence of "serving technological realities"—not pursuing vague "industry standards," but targeting real scenarios that traditional systems struggle to cover, such as solving cross-border payment efficiency and cost issues for Latin American users and exploring adaptation solutions for areas with weak infrastructure.
In summary, Anoma's value lies not only in technological compatibility but also in its "anti-involution" industry perspective:
While most projects compete on technical parameters, it focuses on "serving more diverse users."
While the industry is obsessed with seizing standard discourse power, it breaks down barriers with "neutral adaptation." This pragmatic approach is the core driving force pushing blockchain from a "niche technology circle" to "mass practicality." @anoma @KaitoAI
14.42K
105
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.