I've been closely following the scalability track of Web3 recently, and I have some deep insights. First, let's talk about @elympics_ai, which belongs to the new generation of blockchain gaming foundations. They leverage blockchain technology to make every esports match traceable and verifiable, with the core gameplay being Play2Win, where the on-chain results are accessible to everyone. The technical point is that each match is recorded on-chain in real-time, and all wins and losses can be traced back, essentially providing a strong foundation for fairness in blockchain gaming. Developers also have a bunch of tools for direct integration, achieving both scalability and transparency. Next, we look at @cookiedotfuncn, which on the surface is a content hub for the Chinese community, but in reality, it is engaging in "mouth-mining." Essentially, it replaces traditional on-chain interactions for airdrop mining with content production. The core point is to use algorithms to capture content diffusion, turning "voice power" into on-chain assets, which can infinitely scale social influence. DAOs collaborating in bulk has already become a trend. Both have bypassed traditional performance bottlenecks: @elympics_ai efficiently records high concurrency in games on-chain, while @cookiedotfuncn uses the InfoFi route to flatten traffic peaks with "intangible assets." Different paths are laying the groundwork for large-scale implementation, with blockchain gaming and content distribution complementing each other. Which scalability method do you all favor? Or do you think both can explode simultaneously? #elympics_ai #cookiedotfuncn #InfoFi #Web3Scalability