Before crypto, I couldn't comprehend the magnitude of large numbers. In my mid-20s: $1.8B market cap token? Is that a lot?" Compared to what? My anchor numbers I 'understood' were $5 meal, $300 rent, $1 ice cream. $1M felt like infinite wealth. $100M+? Just "crazy lots of money." And $500m? A billion? 10 billion? A WHOLE TRILLION? Our brains suck at magnitudes beyond lived experience. I had no scale to anchor it. The picture below visualizes the magnitude. Now, the MC of $DOGE is $36B. What does this number mean to you? In comparison, the GDP of Iceland is $31B. El Salvador - $34B. GDP measures annual output, market cap is speculative value. Imperfect comparison, but shocking for scale. Ralph Lauren clothing company MC is $18B, and Ford is $45b, 'just' $9B more than $DOGE. Putting a meme coin beside Ford feels... absurd? Well, #BTC market cap $2.3 trillion is the same size of GDP as Italy, and larger than Canada, Brazil, or Russia. Bitcoin overtook Alphabet (Google), Meta, and Silver! Now, I see everything through crypto MC: Norway's $2T wealth fund ~= Bitcoin's market cap. Is BTC overvalued, or is Norway just insanely rich? UK raised £12.1B in CGT? That's the market cap of $HYPE - a token with just a few tens of thousands of holders. --- Anyway, crypto industry is well aware of this Scope Insensitivity or large number numbness: You'll see retail degens dreaming of $XRP hitting $10. At $10 USD, $XRP FDV would hit $1 trillion (half the BTC) but they think BTC at $120 000 USD is 'expensive'. Many don't even know you can buy a fraction of BTC. That's why bitcoiners push to price BTC in sats. Seeing BTC at $120 000 feels 'expensive' yet seeing it at $0.12M on a Bloomberg terminal shows growth potential. --- By any traditional measures, crypto looks expensive. Adjusting for liquidity (cashing out $36B DOGE) shows our huge paper wealth. The comparisons force perspective. And I see numbers trough crypto market caps. Anyway, GM, and have a nice Sunday.