I'm not team @kamino, but I do use them a lot, so I'm curious since this found itself on my timeline and would like to see what the team has to say. However, I do feel the post below is a bit disingenuous: >fake APRS Everyone does that, its been a staple of DeFi since late '20, and UI reflects what its being paid in. I do agree its garbage though. >shitting on competitors Seems someone's jimmies got rustled, everyone's free to say whatever they want to whoever they want, first amendment and all that. >bullying smaller teams to migrate liq This isn't bullying, its called BD, if you want exposure on the platform you have to pay something; ultimately the benefits have to outweigh the price. >faking liquidation parameters Idk which instance this is so can't comment, bad if true. >charging the highest fees to their users in the whole industry across all chains Again, bold claim, have been using them for a while now, what are the fees exactly? >blocking users from leaving the platform How? I've withdrawn/closed positions multiple times, bridged just fine, what? >multisig So is Hyperliquid, doesn't really change much? >pushing users into negative APYs Again not sure which instance exactly, but I've used them for a while now and have actually had negative APYs for borrowing if set up correctly. IDK tho. Sounds too upset or am I reading this wrong?