Octave (Jump Further)
Octave (Jump Further)
HYPE+2,24 %
CRV0,00 %
USDC+0,41 %
I compared the liquidity of each of the stables operated by USDH candidates. I looked at their quotes against USDC (from $50K to $5M) and it seems that: ➡️ All of them except frxUSD and AUSD (not in chart) have deep liquidity until 500K trades ➡️ USDS, USDP and PYUSD are the only maintaining over 0.9995 (i.e. 5bps differential) above $1M ➡️ AUSD is still pretty small (less than $50M mcap on Mainnet) and basically has no interesting quotes above $200K. Ofc their liquidity can vary and can largely improve in the future, but it gives a glimpse of the maturity of all stablecoins mentioned in the proposals/
Gallery 1
Ash
Ash
So @HyperliquidX just opened a request for proposal (RFP) to assign the $USDH ticker to a 3rd party stablecoin issuer (stakers and validators vote on the proposal of their choice). Why Hyperliquid wants this This would greatly reduce the reliance on USDC/Coinbase, and most importantly keep reserve yield + liq incentives inside the HL ecosystem --> why let value leak to external parties? Projects involved • @ethena_labs: Fiat-backed USDH via USDtb; ≥95% of net reserve yield routed back to HL + migration paths from USDC • @Paxos: Enterprise rails and audits; returns 95% of interest to $HYPE buybacks and eco • @withAUSD: State Street custody + @vaneck_us asset manager; 100% of net revenue to HL; $10m+ day-1 liq on HL • @fraxfinance: USDH at frxUSD parity; 0% take rate, on-chain T-bill yield to HL; mint/redeem across frxUSD/USDC/USDT/fiat • @fiege_max (Native Markets): Issuer-agnostic via Bridge; 50% yield stream to the Hyperliquid Assistance Fund, 50% to growth; programmatic mint/redeem • @CurveFinance: dUSDH stablecoin which is a a decentralized CDP twin (crvUSD/LLAMMA) to sit alongside a regulated USDH • @SkyEcosystem: USDS-style multi-colalt with PSM; instant 2.2b USDC redemption; directs ~4.85% return on HL-held USDH to HYPE buybacks • @BastionPlatform: NYDFS-chartered trust; issuance-as-a-service; free USD mint/redemptions, compliance-first What is most important • HL-first + HL-aligned • Compliant • Revenue-share % + day-1 liquidity • Custodians + redemptions This is big, literally choosing who powers HL’s stablecoin which would have massive volumes Read more about the differences below
Gallery 1
Hentet fratwitter
5,2k
0
Innholdet på denne siden er levert av tredjeparter. Med mindre annet er oppgitt, er ikke OKX forfatteren av de siterte artikkelen(e) og krever ingen opphavsrett til materialet. Innholdet er kun gitt for informasjonsformål og representerer ikke synspunktene til OKX. Det er ikke ment å være en anbefaling av noe slag og bør ikke betraktes som investeringsråd eller en oppfordring om å kjøpe eller selge digitale aktiva. I den grad generativ AI brukes til å gi sammendrag eller annen informasjon, kan slikt AI-generert innhold være unøyaktig eller inkonsekvent. Vennligst les den koblede artikkelen for mer detaljer og informasjon. OKX er ikke ansvarlig for innhold som er vert på tredjeparts nettsteder. Beholdning av digitale aktiva, inkludert stablecoins og NFT-er, innebærer en høy grad av risiko og kan svinge mye. Du bør nøye vurdere om handel eller innehav av digitale aktiva passer for deg i lys av din økonomiske tilstand.